lundi 24 février 2014
jeudi 13 février 2014
Violence, Censorship and Freedom of Press: The Moroccan case (Part 4)
In comparison of the today’s situation with that prevailed at the beginning of 2000, it reveals some change considering the respect of the freedom, but this improvement still has its limits. In fact, the liberalization of the Moroccan media landscape in 2005 did lead to the flowering of several private radios, regulated by the High Authority of Audiovisual Communication (HACA). And the Moroccan press has undergone significant changes in terms of the diversity of their specialization and the growth of editorial teams.
Moroccan media, all
types include, are still mainstream media, even more there are only few local media.
In fact, an auditing firm has made a report to the Ministry of Communication
about the progress of the situation of the freedom of the press. Among the
obstacles regarding the printing press, it listed the distribution of
newspapers in the territory that is still very limited. In fact, for the
newspapers’ distribution networks, the firm listed as much as 1000 points of
sale, including kiosks and small stores. Also, the professionalization of the
sector recorded a very low level for all types of media companies. Furthermore,
the loosing of reader’s interest in reading newspapers is also a significant
obstacle.
Last year, on January
18, a parliamentary accused of rape, sentenced in first instance to a year in
prison, was acquitted on appeal while the victim was jailed for contempt of
court. It lasts for three years; the trial was finally unnoticed until a
blogger report the information and protests against this verdict. When there is no
result in political or court scandals that are covered by the media, through
the redundancy effect carried by a multitude of similar cases, it seems to be
that the reader is disillusioned by the impunity of the person in charge. In
fact, in Morocco, scandals do not rise to media coverage. It’s explains the
fact that there's no renewed buying newspapers. But, talking about court
cases, Mr. Hidass hinted at Anouzla’s case for explaining that “the media don’t
have enough information to tell”.
mercredi 5 février 2014
lundi 3 février 2014
Violence, Censorship and Freedom of Press: The Moroccan case (Part 2)
As
Omar Radi, an independent Moroccan journalist who works as a freelance
journalist said : “It’s true now with online media, journalist can express themselves
freely but they don’t know what time they will be oppressed because there are
no rules!”
For years, the official red lines in Morocco: the monarchy, religion and, territorial
integrity (The Sahara issue), repress the freedom of speech. But nowdays, for him,
they’re other ways for repressing the journalists’ freedom of speech. When the defenders of press freedom pointed
out that in Morocco there are many lawsuits against journalists, the government
replied by an economical obstruct by putting pressure on the advertisers who
finance the media economics. He explained that the threesome: lawsuits, economy stifling, and closure of
media companies are serving now as lesson to others journalists for never crossing
those red lines.
“Censorship is less striking in these recent
years. In fact, it’s the self-censorship who prevails.”, indicate Omar Radi talking
about the main obstacle for a Free Press. For a long time, Omar was advocating
for the freedom of speech and human rights, that’s the reason why he decided
to join the February 20 movement as well as for defending his ideals.
For him, anti-democratic powers domesticate
and / or repress the press as it can never play this role. He confides that “A
Free Press is an important level for democratization of the country; it must
dig into her past to understand the present and inform the society about how the
public affairs are managed”. In most democracies, a Free Press is meant to be a
counter-power and the role of the journalist is to question those whom are in
power on the way they handle it.
Free press is also considered to be a safeguard for democracy and
freedoms. But for Jihane Salhi,
a Moroccan radio journalist, who worked in “Aswat” before working for “Hit
Radio” the “Freedom of press doesn’t exist in Morocco!” For her, the main
reason that explains the fact that there’s no freedom of press is the non
respect of the freedom of thought in the Moroccan society.”
Although, the new Moroccan Constitution of 2011 "guarantees freedom of thought, opinion and
expression in all its forms" (article 25), for her, it’s extremely rare to
see journalists doing their job properly and completely without censoring
themselves or before being confront to censorship.
In effect, the
freedom of the press is very much related to the freedom of speech. But, it’s
also related to the freedom of thought as long as the journalist has to be free
for shaping his own opinions. She added: “The bosses who run a media usually
have economic or financial interest in choosing the editorial line, especially
when the majority of them don’t know what the real assignment of the journalist
is”.
In fact, Jihane
belongs to those journalists who haven’t been able to keep a fixed job. She reveals that after an unfair dismissal,
she chose to continue studying for having a master in economics and media
management at ISIC. Through her experience, she knows
that journalists had a responsibility towards the society which they are
addressing. But she noticed that editors fail in imposing ethics of journalism and
above all journalists' rights are still being violated.
As a matter of fact, her
dismissal dates back to September 2012, when El Ghorfi, the manager of “Aswat”
began to complain of lack of publicity and therefore less money. One
month after, the manager decided to change the editorial line by opting for
more entertainment and less information. Jihane and three other journalists who
were in charge of news were laid off without receiving their severance
pay.
Inscription à :
Articles (Atom)